I spent 50 years writing “the first draft of history.” I left that task to younger souls almost a year ago now. I still do some clerical work for my last set of colleagues, so I can have a little more spending money, and I still write first drafts on the side.

First drafts of what, one might ask, and I’m not quite sure. Some of what appears here in the blog will end up in books, some in songs. Like some of my city council or court stories, some could use a second draft or a revision, but I rarely had time for a second draft; it was “here you are” and on to tomorrow’s news.

I wrote what I saw. I honestly believed that it was not my role to pass judgment, so I kept my opinions out of my work as best I could. After awhile, a guy starts to have opinions. Still, it’s a good exercise to work to understand those with different beliefs, especially when your job is to explain what’s happening fairly and accurately — the first draft of history is going to affect every other draft as time goes on, after all.

It should not be obvious whether the reporter loves or despises the people s/he is writing about. In a perfect world the reporter will be neutral, but that doesn’t happen much anymore, and I don’t get the feeling neutrality is encouraged in these times.

I suppose I came to libertarianism — and not the Libertarian Party, by the way — because my job required me to try to portray Democrats and Republicans in as neutral terms as I could muster. That meant understanding what they believed and what they opposed in the never-ending theater they acted in. 

It quickly becomes clear that everyone wants the same things for the most part — comfort, food, shelter, a better life for their kids and themselves, clean air, clean water, not to be hassled by criminals — and the political stage is a quarrel over the best way to have those things. It has devolved into a struggle for the power to impose their solutions on the rest of us, whether we like it or not.

The libertarian way is to let informed individuals make their own decisions about their lives. My job was to provide that information in a way that helped people make up their own minds.

Ultimately that led to my core belief — Love God and love your neighbor. Some of our neighbors have idiotic political notions — forgive me for being blunt — but they honestly believe those notions will lead to a better world, and what’s not to love about someone who wants a better world? Some Christians condense it to “love the sinner, hate the sin,” but there’s enough hate in the world. The idea is to love the neighbor, unconditionally. You may have serious questions about their politics and life choices, but that doesn’t make them less worthy of love.

At least that’s what I’m putting in my first draft, although I’m pretty sure that thought will make it into future versions, too.